RE[3]: Comment by Terg
This is not really true. I use both RHEL and CentOS in production and I can say with a high degree of confidence that while CentOS usually takes a while to get in sync when Red Hat does version updates...
View ArticleRE[6]: Comment by Terg
Not to mention that SUSE pretty much sucks. They've brought some good things to the plate, but I've never had anything but problems with the distribution, though SLES was fairly stable, it was put into...
View ArticleRE[5]: Comment by Terg
Maybe and maybe not. Depending on your requirements and your personal taste. Given the fact that I had kernel issues getting fixed within 24h on RHEL (from bugzilla to download) I find it hard to...
View ArticleRE[3]: Comment by Terg
I'd agree completely, if outside support is important to your situation Red Hat's team is one of the best in the industry.
View ArticleRE[2]: Comment by Terg
I'd think twice before putting production machines on CentOS. E.g. RHEL 5.5 was released on the 30/3 while CentOS 5.5 was released on the 14/5 - a month and a half. As far as I remember, CentOS 3.7...
View ArticleRE: Comment by Terg
Typical corporate jargon really. for the typical corporate bobblehead. Not that Red Hat's support hasn't been sterling every time I've dealt with them... just for your average enthusiast user it'd be...
View ArticleComment by Terg
Man, I don't like the tone of that article. All hail Linux and all that, but damn"Yes, we shit golden turds that smell like roses. And you should eat them, because we are awesome">_>
View Article
